Reid-Brinkley’s dissertation to recognize that debate is “too white, too male, and too straight.” That conclusion can be made by observing the writing on the wall.
![y a bon banania meaning fanon y a bon banania meaning fanon](https://krytykapolityczna.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/16873688118_eeb98c62be_k-1024x576.jpg)
The race-centered, performative style of debate has been heavily influenced by a number of thinkers, including Reid-Brinkley, Daryl Burch, Ede Warner, and Rashad Evans who do not agree on a single method or mode of resistance within debate competition. We would like to see evidence of this urge to define a universal black resistance in debate that is the central internal link to Bankey’s criticism. We challenge Bankey to point to a place in any of Reid-Brinkley’s work where she has argued for a unitary, exclusive form of resistance.
![y a bon banania meaning fanon y a bon banania meaning fanon](https://live.staticflickr.com/7172/13385104804_665d8e49ab_n.jpg)
Not only does Bankey attempt to place Reid-Brinkley at the head of a mo(ve)ment that has been successful exactly because of its lack of structure or central leadership, but he also incorrectly assumes that Reid-Brinkley’s work has offered a single method and/or theory of resistance for black debaters. The thesis is populated by a number of references to race-centered alternative debate practice and practitioners, such as “Reid-Brinkley’s model of resistance,” “Reid-Brinkley’s movement,” “Reid-Brinkley’s supporters,” “Reid-Brinkley’s theory of resistance,” and “Reid-Brinkley’s resistance.” What initially strikes us is the reduction of the framing of resistance. Reid-Brinkley as the bad black mother, the black matriarch, the failed female parent attached to the failed (and absentee) black father (Fanon) who produces deviant black children. The Bad Negro Family and Bankey’s Misreading of the Mo(ve)mentīankey’s fundamental misreading of the Reid-Brinkley dissertation and the development of race-centered debate practice produces a caricature of Dr. We argue that the Bankey thesis is riddled with faulty assumptions and misinterpretations of Fanon, the Reid-Brinkley dissertation, and the practices of race-centered debate in contemporary competition. Yet, in this essay we hope to describe some serious concerns with this particular project in the hopes of adding even more complexity to our community’s current discussion of race, argument, and competitive political deliberation. The growing body of academic work on race-centered debate practice is a productive turn in our community-wide consideration of issues of inclusion/exclusion and the processes of knowledge production in debate. The following comments are designed to offer a thoughtful engagement with the recent release of Brendon Bankey’s Wake Forest University M.A.
![y a bon banania meaning fanon y a bon banania meaning fanon](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/~9IAAOSw4dNf7lmz/s-l300.jpg)
Assistant Professor of Public Address and Advocacyĭirector of Debate, William Pitt Debating Unionĭoctoral Student, Department of Communicationĭoctoral Student, Department of Culture & Theory